
Q1 Best Answer: D
The shareholder is protected by the statutory pre-emption rights contained in the Companies Act 2006. Where a private company with one class of ordinary shares proposes to allot new equity securities for cash, those shares must first be offered to existing shareholders in proportion to their current holdings, unless the rights have been validly disapplied. Since the company has only one class of ordinary shares and uses the Model Articles, the shareholder should be offered the opportunity to subscribe for his proportionate share of the new issue before the shares are allotted to the outside investor.
Why the other answers are wrong:
A. Incorrect. Statutory pre-emption rights apply to private companies as well as public companies, unless excluded or disapplied.
B. Incorrect. The protection arises primarily from statute, not from a contractual right under the Model Articles.
C. Incorrect. A shareholder holding 10% cannot generally block a special resolution, which requires at least 75% approval. In any event, the issue concerns pre-emption rights rather than a right to veto the allotment.
E. Incorrect. The allotment does not affect class rights because the company has only one class of ordinary shares. Dilution of voting power is not, by itself, a variation of class rights requiring unanimous approval.
Get unlimited attempts to the SQE1 Mini Mock Exam by clicking here,
and enter this access code: passwithus
Q2 Best Answer: C
Statutory pre-emption rights under the Companies Act 2006 apply only to the allotment of equity securities for cash. Here, the company is issuing shares as consideration for the transfer of a software business, which is non-cash consideration. As a result, the statutory pre-emption provisions do not apply, even though the allotment will dilute the minority shareholder’s voting and economic interests.
Why the other answers are wrong:
A. Incorrect. Statutory pre-emption rights do not apply to all allotments of ordinary shares; they apply only where equity securities are allotted for cash.
B. Incorrect. Dilution of voting power does not itself trigger statutory pre-emption rights. The key question is whether the shares are being issued for cash.
D. Incorrect. Existing shareholders do not have a right to unanimous approval merely because an allotment affects their economic interests. Provided the directors have authority to allot the shares and comply with the Companies Act, the allotment may proceed.
E. Incorrect. A shareholder who objects to a lawful allotment has no general right to require the company to purchase his shares at fair value. Such rights arise only in limited statutory or contractual circumstances, which are not present here.
A Gift from SQE Success
Test your knowledge with our SQE1 Mini Mock Exam and see how you perform.
Enjoy unlimited attempts — completely free. Start the mock exam here:
https://www.classmarker.com/online-test/start/?quiz=n366a2f53a08c080
Access Code: passwithus
Read SQE Exam Passing Tips and other SQE MCQ Explanation Here.