The Trustee’s Dilemma: Helping One Beneficiary Without Unfairly Favouring Them

Best Answer: D

A contingent interest absolutely qualifies a beneficiary to receive an advancement. The entire purpose of a power of advancement is to allow capital to be given before an interest vests.

Under Section 69(2) of the Trustee Act 1925, express powers conferred by a trust instrument operate independently of, and can override, statutory restrictions. While the statutory power of advancement under Section 32 of the Trustee Act 1925 contains a strict limit (preventing advances that exceed the beneficiary's presumptive share), Fiona is not bound by this statutory limit because she possesses a wide express power in the trust instrument to "apply or transfer capital... in such manner as the trustee considers appropriate." 

 

The only limit on Fiona here is her core fiduciary duties: she must act in good faith, ensure it genuinely benefits Daniel, and properly balance his request against Erin’s competing interest in the remaining fund.

The fact that the proposed advancement exceeds Daniel’s expected share does not automatically invalidate the exercise of the power, although it is a highly relevant factor that Fiona must consider when deciding whether the advancement is appropriate.

Get unlimited attempts to the SQE1 Mini Mock Exam by clicking here,

and enter this access code: passwithus

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A is incorrect because it describes the old pre-October 2014 statutory restriction (the "one-half" rule), which does not apply here both because of the express clause and because modern statutory law allows up to 100%.

Option B is incorrect because it wrongly assumes that a power of advancement is capped at the beneficiary’s presumptive entitlement.

Option C is incorrect because there is no legal requirement in trust law for a trustee to obtain the informed written consent of other contingent beneficiaries to exercise an express power of advancement, though considering their interests is required.

Option E is incorrect because a contingent interest absolutely qualifies a beneficiary to receive an advancement; the entire purpose of a power of advancement is to allow capital to be given before an interest vests.

Test your exam readiness with our SQE1 Mock Exam and see how you perform.

https://www.sqesuccess.top/sqe-mock

For more information, read our FAQ.

Read SQE Exam Passing Tips and other SQE MCQ Explanation Here.

Blog Categories

SQE MCQ Explained

SQE Exam Tips

Reflections from Farrah

© 2026 SQE Success. All rights reserved.

SQE Success is a trading name of Sharp Vision Consulting Co., Ltd.